Pack 01
Reinforced Concrete Works: Substructure
RAMS, risk register, ITP, COSHH, site forms and toolbox talks for pile caps, abutments, wing walls, columns and bases — with the excavation, blinding, rebar, formwork, pour, curing and striking that go with them.
Written out in full. Not a skeleton with prompts. Where a value has to be yours — a level, a mix, a platform certificate number — it appears as a marked field with a note saying what answer is acceptable, so you are never guessing what the box wants.
Card details never touch this site — payment is handled by Stripe. You get the download immediately after payment.
The format, plainly: nine plain-text Markdown (.md) files in one ZIP. They open in any editor, and they paste into Word or Google Docs with the headings and tables intact, ready for your letterhead. What you are buying is the drafting — the wording, the hold points, the acceptance criteria — not a pre-branded template.
What you get
- Full RAMS / Safe System of Work — front matter, review and consultation record, method with hold points in line, interfaces, resources, permits, environmental controls, emergency arrangements
- Risk register — 34 rows, dual-scored, every row with a named owner role, plus the instructions for swapping in your client’s matrix without mis-scoring it
- Inspection and Test Plan — preparation, materials, build sequence, defect repairs, close-out, with acceptance criteria that are actually testable
- COSHH set — release agent, curing compound, retarder, wet cement, and respirable crystalline silica
- Site forms — task briefing sheet, POWRA, briefing record, deviation register, weekly review register, permit register
- Hold-point method — the nine classes and the placement test, so you can adapt the pack to any element
- Reviewer pre-empt — the seven comments a principal contractor’s checker actually writes, and the pre-submission run that kills them
- Six toolbox talks, each with a brief-back question
The traps it is built around
These are the things documents actually get returned for. Every one of them is called out in the pack, at the point where it bites.
Two lead-time clocks, and they stack
Your own procedure says RAMS to your HSEQ manager five working days out. The principal contractor’s says fourteen working days to them, because their specialist consultation runs sequentially. Five days out, you have already missed their window — and on anything touching temporary works, lifting or a highway, author-to-approver routinely runs four to ten weeks.
A drawing listed without its revision
A stock rejection. Reviewers check the revision you quoted against the current issue. An empty temporary-works register is worse still — it says nobody has thought about the falsework yet.
A risk matrix carried over from the last job
There are at least three incompatible scoring systems in current UK use. They do not interconvert and their action bands differ, so a pasted table silently mis-bands every row against the new client’s thresholds. The pack shows you how to swap the matrix in ten minutes without breaking the scores.
PPE credited with reducing severity
Controls reduce likelihood. Severity only moves if the work physically changes. Ear defenders cannot make hearing loss less severe — and this is the defect that clusters in exactly the health rows a competent reviewer reads first.
An empty owner column
Blank on every row in most registers in circulation, because it is blank in the template they all descend from. It is the cheapest quality win available and the first thing a reviewer scans for.
"Permit to pump" written once
It means two entirely different permits — concrete pumping, issued by temporary works against an accepted platform, and dewatering, issued by the environment team against a discharge consent. Different issuer, different lead time, different consequence. Write one row and the site team is guessing which one they hold.
Who it is for
The person in a subcontractor who got handed quality and safety alongside their day job, and now has to submit to a principal contractor who reviews properly. If you are already issuing accepted RAMS on Tier 1 infrastructure every month, you will find things in here worth stealing, but you do not need it.
It is a working document set, not legal advice and not a compliance guarantee. It still has to be made true for your job, by someone competent, and approved by a named person on your side before it goes anywhere. Nothing in it reproduces the text of a British Standard, a Eurocode or a contract form — standards are cited by number and clause so you can go to your own copy.
And when you are tired of doing it in Word
The pack is the documents. Stathia is the system that writes, versions, briefs and signs them off — RAMS and ITPs authored against your own specification, hold points that live in one place, and a briefing record that proves the brief-back rather than just the signature.
See what Stathia does →